Legal intelligence

Know what
supports the answer.

Research law. Inspect authority. Understand what was verified. Organize work by matter when you need to. Your judgment stays in control.

Try ELIOS
Built in Atlanta, Georgia. Built for the lawyers doing the work.
The problem

AI can sound certain when the legal foundation is not.

A fluent paragraph is not authority. A citation that looks right is not a citation that is right, and a statute that existed is not necessarily a statute in force. Attorneys need to see what supports an answer before they stand behind it.

Why ELIOS is different

The model is one component. Legal intelligence surrounds it.

Typical AI
1Question
2Model
3Confident answer

A fluent answer alone does not establish its legal foundation.

ELIOS
1Attorney question
2Legal retrieval
3Authority classification
4Official-source verification, where supported
5Currentness checks
6Model reasoning
7Citation and evidence presentation
8Attorney review
Illustrative product experience

Inspect what supports the answer.

Select a citation to see the source behind it, its classification, and exactly how far verification has gone.

Research · GeorgiaIllustrative
Draft analysis for attorney review

Statutory authority is cited at , and appellate treatment is cited at . Facts from the matter record come from private evidence , which is never treated as legal authority.

Each citation carries its own verification state. Review the individual verification details before relying on a source.

O.C.G.A. § 10-12-7Statute · Official Georgia authority
Text verifiedCurrentness: confirmation required
Appellate authorityCase law · Classified as judicial authority
Verification pending
Correspondence.pdfMatter evidence · OCR text extracted
Private evidence, not authority
ResearchMattersDraftingEvidenceTimelineSolo Attorney
Active matters
Default Matter0 files
Agent tools
Doc AnalyzerResearcherAudio/VideoTimeline
MatterDefaultEvidence0Authorities0CourtListenerStandbyTimelineStandby
Defense CounselDefendantPlaintiffProsecutorNeutral
Ask anything about this matter…

Illustrative workspace layout. Counts and statuses are examples, not live workspace data.

Verification

Review the details behind a verification status.

Source locatedWhere the authority was found.
Text verifiedWhether the wording matches the source.
Authority provenanceWhat kind of authority it is, and from whom.
Currentness verifiedWhether it is established as current.
Attorney reviewYour independent review is required.

Text verification does not establish that an authority is current. Attorneys must independently confirm currentness before relying on an authority.

Authority inspection
O.C.G.A. § 10-12-7
SourceOfficial Georgia authority
TextVerified
CurrentnessConfirmation required
Attorney reviewRequired
Illustrative of status behavior. This example does not establish the currentness of the cited statute.
Legal research

Jurisdiction-aware authority, with citations you can inspect.

Scoped to jurisdiction

Jurisdiction metadata helps rank retrieved sources. Review jurisdiction and authority before relying on results.

Authority classified

Source classification distinguishes legal authority from matter evidence.

Citation-aware

Statutory citations are recognized for what they are, without false claims of judicial verification.

Built for the lawyers doing the work

Serious legal intelligence should not require a global-firm technology budget.

Large firms spread research across associates, knowledge teams and litigation-support staff. Solo, independent and boutique attorneys often carry that work personally. That is exactly why they deserve a disciplined system: fewer people share the load, so every step needs to be traceable.

Solo & independent

Research, authority and work product in one place you can stand behind.

Boutique & small firms

Specialized practices get a research environment that reflects how they actually work.

Growing & midsize teams

Matter boundaries and organization separation that scale with the practice.

Matter intelligence

Research law. Organize work by matter.

Legal questions

Ask a legal question without uploading a document.

Matter-centered work

Matter context connects research, evidence and drafting.

Evidence & OCR

Ingest pleadings, exhibits and correspondence, with OCR text extraction for scanned documents.

Chronology

Dated events extracted from matter documents into an organized factual record.

Drafting & work product

Assist with draft memoranda and work product from matter context, with export. Citations and conclusions require attorney review.

Private vs. public

Private evidence stays separate from public authority. Client documents are never cited as precedent.

Audio & video

Upload matter media for transcription alongside documents and images.

Work from a role

Set the perspective you're working from: defense counsel, defendant, plaintiff, prosecutor or neutral.

Export

Export a thread or a memo straight from the workspace.

Attorney control

You interpret. You advise. You decide.

ELIOS organizes evidence, surfaces authority and shows its work. The attorney remains responsible for interpretation, strategy, advice and final work product.

Security & isolation

Built with legal boundaries in mind.

Authenticated access

Production workspace access requires sign-in.

Organization & matter isolation

Tenant boundaries and matter-level access controls, with cross-tenant access denied.

Role-based permissions

Explicit permissions govern matter creation, uploads, drafting and administration.

Fails closed

Configured durable workspaces refuse writes if required storage is unavailable.

NfiniteMindAI · Atlanta

Independent technology, from a real place.

ELIOS is built by NfiniteMindAI LLC in Atlanta, Georgia, by a company that made a deliberate opening-market decision: serious legal intelligence for attorneys who need to research, verify, understand, and stand behind the answer.

The law deserves more than a confident answer.

Try ELIOS